Gustavo Fernandes de Andrade

• Two subsidiary companies of a Singapore-based group engaged in offshore rig design and construction, the respondents in an ICC arbitration seated in New York commenced by a Dutch subsidiary of the major Brazilian state-owned oil and gas company. The dispute arose from an EPC contract for a Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO). New York law was applicable to merits of the dispute, and English was the language of the proceedings.
• A Brazilian renewable energy subsidiary of an US multinational conglomerate, the respondent in an ICC arbitration seated in São Paulo commenced by a Brazilian wind turbine blade manufacturer, the world’s biggest player in the sector. The dispute arose from a supply agreement for wind blades. 
• Four Brazilian and Swiss subsidiaries of the world's largest steel producer, the claimants in an ICC arbitration seated in Geneva against a Swiss company, and its Brazilian subsidiary, the world’s largest producers of graphite electrodes. The dispute arose from several take-or-pay contracts for the purchase of graphite electrodes. Brazilian and Swiss law applied, and English was the language of the proceedings.
• Three special-purpose vehicles controlled by a power development and investment company headquartered in Qatar, the respondents in an ICC arbitration seated in São Paulo commenced by a Brazilian subsidiary of the largest state-owned Chinese company engaged in the construction of renewable energy projects. The dispute arose from an EPC agreement for the construction of a solar power plant located in the northeast region of Brazil. Brazilian law applied, and Portuguese was the language of the proceedings.
• Barra Energia do Brasil Petróleo e Gás Ltda., respondent in an ICC arbitration seated in Rio de Janeiro commenced by Dommo Energia S.A. (formerly known as OGX). The dispute arose from the concession agreement for the exploration, development, and operation of the Atlanta e Oliva Fields (BS-4 Block), located in the Santos Basin. 
• A Brazilian subsidiary of a major Spanish group engaged in the construction and energy sector, respondent in an ICC arbitration seated in São Paulo commenced by two companies controlled by a leading Chinese manufacturer of automotive equipment. The dispute arose from a supply agreement for photovoltaic solar modules. 
• A Brazilian subsidiary of an Italian-Argentine steelmaking conglomerate, the claimant in an ICC arbitration seated in Rio de Janeiro against the Brazilian subsidiary of a Swiss company engaged in the production and distribution of electro-technical equipment. The dispute arose from an EPC agreement for the construction of the power facilities for an integrated steel mill plant owned by the claimant and dealt with various work defects claims related to switchgears supplied by the respondent. 
• Barra Energia do Brasil Petróleo e Gás Ltda., the respondent in a UNCITRAL arbitration administered by the LCIA, seated in Paris, initiated by Dommo Energia S.A. The dispute arose from the performance of a joint operating agreement for the exploration, development, and operation of an oilfield located in the Santos Basin. 
• A renewable energy subsidiary of one of the largest Chinese players for power generation, distribution, and retail in a CAM-CCBC arbitration seated in São Paulo against a sugar cane mill owner. The dispute arose from the performance of a consortium agreement for the generation and sale of the energy produced by a biomass plant owned by the claimant. 
• A Brazilian subsidiary of a Paris-based group  developing of systems for railway transportation in a CAM-CCBC arbitration seated in Rio de Janeiro against a state-owned public transportation company. The dispute arose from a rolling stock supply agreement related to the construction of the system of light rail vehicles in the City of Rio de Janeiro. 
• A Brazilian steel producer in a LMAA (London Maritime Arbitrators Association) arbitration seated in London against a Canadian-based mining company crushed and broken limestone. The dispute arose from a supply agreement for the sale and purchase of high calcium limestone. English law was applied, and English was the language of the proceedings.
• A Chinese oil and gas major player as respondent in a LCIA  (London Court of International Arbitration), arbitration seated in London initiated by a Brazilian company engaged in the construction of onshore and offshore pipelines. The dispute arose from an EPC agreement for the construction of a gas pipeline in the state of Bahia, Brazil. Brazilian law was applied, and English was the language of the proceedings.

Other Matters

Represented:

• A Dutch-subsidiary of the world’s leading marketing and communication conglomerate, respondent in a CAM-CCBC arbitration initiated by three Brazilian top-ranked executives engaged in the marketing and advertising sector. The dispute arose from the acquisition of two digital and social media marketing agencies and relates to the performance of earn-out provisions included in a quota purchase agreement entered between the claimants and the respondent.
• A Bermuda-incorporated subsidiary of a Norwegian-based  global maritime group involved in shipping, floating gas infrastructure and deepwater oil and gas production, the claimant in an ICC arbitration seated in New York against a Dutch subsidiary of the major Brazilian state-owned oil and gas company. The dispute arose from an EPC contract for the FPSO. The main claim relates to compensation for additional costs incurred in connection with the construction work of the FPSO.
• A Brazilian investor engaged in the paper and cellulose industry, the respondent in a CAM-CCBC arbitration seated in São Paulo, against the largest pulp and paper company in Latin America. The dispute arose from the share purchase agreement. Brazilian law was applied, and Portuguese was the language of the proceedings.

• Recognized in Dispute Resolution: Litigation – Chambers & Partners Brazil, 2023
• Recognized in Dispute Resolution: Arbitration – Chambers & Partners Brazil, 2022-2023
• Mentioned as Excellent in Arbitration – Leaders League Brazil, 2022-2023
• Mentioned as Highly Recommended in Litigation – Leaders League Brazil, 2022-2023
• "An impressive lawyer … always dedicated to quickly answering the client and has excellent law knowledge … has broad experience in litigation and arbitration in Brazil … our best lawyer for international arbitrations … knows everything in this area, the regulations and the details." – Chambers & Partners Brazil, 2023
• Recognized in Dispute Resolution: Arbitration – Chambers & Partners Global, 2022-2023
• “Has extensive experience and his ability to handle strategic litigation is impressive … a strong and sharp lawyer.” – Chambers & Partners Brazil, 2022
• Mentioned as Highly Recommended in Civil and Commercial Litigation – Leaders League Brazil, 2022
• "A very good strategist and his international practice adds value for us." – Chambers & Partners Latin America, 2021
• "Understands complex matters that are specific to the client's business, which allows him to perfectly combine legal and technical aspects in his defences." – Chambers & Partners Global, 2021
• Has "excellent technical knowledge and market awareness. He has a frank and clear communication with the client, while understanding our needs." – Chambers & Partners Brazil, 2021
• “Stands out for his wide knowledge in a variety of matters … can be direct to the point without losing sight of the big picture … is one of the best arbitration lawyers in the country .Fully dedicated to clients and with great attention to detail.”– The Legal 500, 2021
• "Shows a remarkable combination of knowledge, experience, practical thinking, familiarity with the relevant industries and sophistication. He has been able to form a very effective team.” – Latin Lawyer 250, 2021
• "Earns plaudits from clients for his quick and innovative thinking.” - Latin Lawyer 250, 2020
• “Very business-oriented and has an exceptional knowledge of the law ." – Chambers Global, 2020
• Mentioned as Highly Recommended in Arbitration – Leaders League, 2020-2021
• Recognized as Thought Leader in Litigation – LACCA Approved, 2019
• "Very technically capable." – Chambers Latin America and Chambers Global, 2019
• Recognized in Dispute Resolution – The Legal 500, 2019
• According to a client  he has “new ideas, know-how” and ability to “respond to requests very quickly” – Latin Lawyer 250, 2019
• Mentioned in Arbitration and Civil & Commercial Litigation – Leaders League Brazil Best Counsel, 2018
• "A well-qualified and educated lawyer." – Chambers & Partners Latin America, 2018
• "Demonstrated great knowledge of international arbitration matters and helped us develop valuable strategies for a complex case." – Chambers & Partners Latin America, 2017
• Recognized in Litigation and Arbitration – Latin Lawyer 250, 2016-2017