Associate

Courtney Krawice

Intellectual Property, ITC Section 337 Actions, Patent Litigation

Washington DC +1 202 263 3357

ckrawice@mayerbrown.com

Übersicht

Courtney Krawice has successfully assisted clients in achieving their desired outcomes in IP litigation matters before the International Trade Commission and US district courts.

Courtney primarily focuses on high-tech patent litigation representing both plaintiffs and defendants but also handles related issues arising in complex patent litigation, such as trade secret and antitrust claims. She has experience handing cases and investigations from start to finish, advising clients from pre-suit diligence through post-trial motions. Courtney has successfully argued on behalf of her clients in various settings, including Markman hearings, pretrial conferences, dispositive motions, and post-trial motion hearings. She has conducted depositions of corporate representatives and expert witnesses, showcasing her ability to navigate complex technical details. Her trial experience includes directing technical expert witnesses on the stand, ensuring that her clients receive robust and informed representation throughout the litigation process.

Courtney’s background in mechanical engineering and prior experiences in the Glushko-Samuelson Intellectual Property Law Clinic and the Department of Justice’s intellectual property litigation group provide the basis of her expertise in the fields of consumer electronic devices, user interfaces, IoT, and smart home surveillance systems. Prior to law school, Courtney worked for two intellectual property boutique firms prosecuting utility and design patents.

Erfahrung

Representative District Court Experience:

Pantech Corporation, et al. v. OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (E.D. Tex. 2022-2024) – Directed technical expert witnesses at trial and damages retrial as well as argued summary judgement, MIL, and JMOL motions to help team obtain a jury verdict of $1 million for client, with the jury finding willful infringement of all claims of patents covering standard-essential wireless communications and user interfaces.
Murj, Inc. v. Rhythm Management Group, LLC et al. (D. Md. 2021) – Drafted the winning motion to dismiss based on invalidity under Section 101 to favorably resolve single-patent infringement case.

Representative Section 337 Experience at the USITC:

Certain Smart Televisions, 337-TA-1338 (ITC 2022-2023) – Obtained settlement on favorable terms for Complainant Maxell after the close of expert discovery involving patents related to smart television technology.
Certain Smart Thermostat Hubs, Systems Containing the Same, and Components of the Same, 337-TA-1339 (ITC 2022-2023) – Settled investigation on favorable terms for Complaint late into the discovery phase of a three-patent investigation concerning smart home and IoT devices patents while serving as the technical lead.
Certain Mobile Electronic Devices, 337-TA-1324 (ITC 2022-2023) – Obtained settlement on favorable terms for Complainant Maxell days prior to the evidentiary hearing involving multiple patents related to image processing, fingerprint authentication, and wireless communication technologies.

Veröffentlichungen und Präsentationen

Ausbildung

American University Washington College of Law, JD, cum laude
Administrative Law Review, Senior Staffer
George Washington University, BS, magna cum laude

Zulassungen

District of Columbia

Courts

US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

Mitgliedschaften

Co-Chair of the Washington DC Bar’s Intellectual Property Community

Courtney Krawice

Übersicht

Erfahrung

verwandte Beratungsfelder und Industrien

Beratungsfelder

Veröffentlichungen und Präsentationen

Publications

USPTO Rolls Out the Climate Change Mitigation Pilot Program in Response to Executive Order 14008 on Climate Change

News

Mayer Brown Lands $10.3M Verdict for Korean Cellphone Manufacturer

Mayer Brown secures significant trial victory for Pantech in patent infringement suit

Ausbildung

Zulassungen

Courts

Mitgliedschaften