概要

We mobilize dedicated cross-practice teams to mitigate the risk of team move disputes, enabling our clients to take quick and decisive action to protect their business.

Employees are a company's greatest asset; conversely, departing employees can create substantial operational and legal risk for businesses. The hire or departure of a team in a raid scenario, which often happens with little or no notice, can lead to several challenges for all parties, including an immediate impact on client and customer relationships, a heavily destabilized business operating in crisis mode, or a business on the receiving end of unlawful recruitment claims.

Most raided businesses do not believe they can fight back to mitigate against potential damage and obtain recompense. But quick and decisive action can protect confidential information, existing business relationships, as well as data - and, at the same time, build a case for financial redress from the competitor.

Our experienced team of employment and litigation lawyers have acted in some of the highest-profile team move cases in recent years. We work on both sides of disputes, regularly advising claimants on unlawful team moves and defendants on lawful recruitment exercises, including at the pre-action stage. Our experience means that we‘ve amassed effective strategies to not only litigate these claims but also to mitigate the risk of litigation. We help clients get ahead of competitors’ plans, even those that may have been months or even years in the making.

Cross-Practice Collaboration

Our strong and experienced employment lawyers have a track record of working seamlessly with our seasoned litigators on high-stakes, complex, and cross-border team move disputes.

Agility

We draw on our deep bench of experienced litigators and employment lawyers to shape the right team for each case, and scale in size to respond to the demands of an expedited trial or time-limited settlement scenario.

We also are adept at managing multiple complex workstreams in parallel, in order to reach a positive outcome on an expedited basis.

International Reach

We work with our colleagues in key jurisdictions around the world, drawing on their local employment law, data privacy, and cross-border litigation knowledge to tackle issues that may arise in a multi-jurisdictional team move. In jurisdictions where Mayer Brown does not have an office, we draw on a wealth of connections with local counsel.

Experience

We have acted in some of the most significant team move disputes in recent years, across a range of industries for both claimants and defendants.

For example, in 2023, we acted for the claimants in the biggest team move case in the London market in decades, resulting in a confidential settlement on the morning of trial. The public elements of the settlement included extensive court undertakings given in favor of our clients to protect their business and a public apology by our clients’ competitor for its admitted unlawful conduct.

Examples of our business protection experience:

Insurance brokers – Guy Carpenter and Co Ltd v Howden Group Holdings Ltd [2023] EWHC 1114 (KB).
Cyber security – Forse & ors v Secarma Ltd & ors [2019] EWCA Civ 215.
Underwriters – QBE Management Services (UK) Ltd v Dymoke [2012] EWHC 80 (QB).
A real estate brokerage company – Represented in a high-profile lawsuit against two former brokers alleging claims for breach of the former employees’ non-competition and non-solicitation covenants. We successfully obtained a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction enforcing the 12-month non-compete on the company’s behalf.
Salebuild in Nexsales v. Salebuild – Obtained dismissal with leave to amend and a subsequent voluntary dismissal with prejudice in this trade secret misappropriation and employee-poaching action brought by a competitor.*
Data communications and telecommunications equipment provider and one of its executives – Representing in two lawsuits involving restrictive covenant, tortious interference, discrimination, and retaliation claims. After obtaining dismissal of nearly all claims against clients, the case settled on favorable terms.
Home Point Fin. Corp. v. Lane, et al., No. 6:20-cv-01819 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 14, 2022) – Following an in-person evidentiary hearing, granting preliminary injunction against former management employee who joined plaintiff’s competitor, extending defendant’s non-solicitation covenant for an additional 12 months, and denying new employer’s motion to dismiss.
Mercer Foods, LLC v. Hulme, et al., C.A. No. 2022-0155 (Del. Ch. 2022) – Enjoining former sales executive from working for the plaintiff’s competitor, soliciting the plaintiff’s employees, or interfering or communicating with the plaintiff’s customers for a 12-month period following the executive’s resignation.
AptarGroup, Inc. v. Chamulak, 2019 WL 2425175 (N.D. Ill. June 10, 2019) – Denying, in its entirety, motion to dismiss all counts in lawsuit against former executive for alleged breach of her non-compete agreement and violations of federal and state trade secrets statutes.
Global consulting firm – Defeated attempts by direct competitor to obtain preliminary injunction prohibiting former employees from working for client based on alleged theft of trade secrets and alleged violations of restrictive covenants.*
Financial institution – Successfully represented senior executive in lawsuit brought by former employer alleging that executive breached restrictive covenants and confidentiality agreement.*
A designer, manufacturer, and distributor of mobile device accessories – Represented in pre-litigation advice regarding the misappropriation of trade secrets by former employees who resigned from the Company en masse to work for a competitor. We subsequently filed a lawsuit against the competitor and several of our client’s former employees, alleging misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract for violations of non-solicitation covenants, breach of the duty of loyalty, violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, and intentional interference with contractual relations.

* Experience gained by lawyer prior to joining Mayer Brown

受賞

Shortlisted for “Litigation Team of the Year,” The Lawyer Awards
"Top litigation team for employment disputes, especially High Court Injunction work”, Legal 500 UK
"Mayer Brown provide thorough advice and guidance tailored to us. Their detailed understanding of our business gives us a genuine reassurance that we are in good hands when it comes to difficult employment matters and complex cases." Chambers UK
"...They are incredibly responsive and knowledgeable and have helped us with a number of labor issues." Legal 500 United States